Chris Matthews Curses & EXPLODES On Gun Carrying Townhall Protester HD Interview Hardball God Dam@
Tags: Bag, barack, beck, birther, blood, care, carried, carrying, Chris, Chris Matthews, controversy, explodes, glenn, God damn, government, Gun, hall, hampshire, hannity, Hardball, health, Heathcare, insurance, interview, jefferson, job, kostric, levin, live, loaded, mark, Matthews, medical, meeting, new, News, nutcase, obama, paul, politics, president, Protester, quote, right, rights, ron, run, sean, Tea, thomas, town, Townhall, tyrants, universal, voted, wack, water, william, wing, With
hint, you are one ignorant fuck.
and why is it not polite? it is a right to carry a gun.
the guy had the right to carry there. what is the big deal?
So, again, with all the history this country has with guns at a presidential rally, we should feel no threat or suspicion whatsoever? really?
it all depends whos hand the gun is in! as i see it he is excercising his right as an american and he is doing it rather responsibly. a gun in the hand of a police officer or a soldier would be a show of force or violence.
It’s a second amendment right to bear arms… not for hunting.. but for protection from tyranny. It’s legal in his locale and no one was shot.. so it’s a non issue. Stop being scared of guns. It’s just a tool like a hammer or screwdriver. You can be killed by hammers and screwdrivers too.
you’re “Promoting a polite society?” Carrying an object that CAN KILL PEOPLE to a protest is not polite. And the news reporter is doing a terrible job interviewing as well.
Our country emerged from a tyrannical English dictatorship. The fathers of our country knew that we would never again give up our freedom without a fight, hence the second amendment. It ain’t gonna happen Chris.
I’n not worried about the protestor, I am worried about the skewed left wing liberals! He did a great job on this interview.
yes all the best to you!
You’re first question is an excellent one, and could spark another lengthy debate that I feel we are both too tapped to tackle.
And I echo you’re second statement. All the best to you.
Does Fox pander? Or are those the opinions of it’s principals? I say the Fox people are a type and that is their honest representation. Same for MSNBC.
We are not going to agree, but I thank you for the opportunity to dialogue and I now think you are more reasonable. Let us do what we can to spread reasonableness. Especially let us identify gun nuts as such and help them to grow up because they cause most of the mishaps. Guns are not toys for boys – they are only for serious people.
Yes, most NRA members fall into the category of people who are influenced by Fox. Can I prove this? I don’t think there is a way too, but I stand by this statement. I am not saying that Fox shapes gun laws, but they pander to the politics and attitudes commonly held by most gun rights advocates. No doubt about it.
Honestly the notion that people should arm themselves sounds more hedonistic to me on the surface than not. Although I will admit it an idea I have barely explored.
You wrote that Fox influences the NRA – my point was that NRA had their perspectives before Fox was around and have not changed, ergo they are not influenced by Fox with regards guns.
I think the right is less emotional and more stoic/anhedonic (Apollonian) whereas the Left is more emotional and hysterical/hedonic (Dionysian). The Apollonian/Dionysian character traits are the cause of Left/Right politics. It has always been that way at least as far as we can tell from ancient literature.
Of course gun rights pre-dates Fox. How could you assume I think that? I watch Fox constantly, it’s a part of what I do. I’m very in touch with their perspective and the impact it has on America and where it’s cross pollenization with the right begins and ends… Also you are absolutely under the effects of hardcore cognitive dissonance if you are saying that the mainstream right is not guilty of just as much (If not way more) ridiculous emotional outbursts.
I am not going to belabor that point. To talk of ones genetics and liken them to a wild animal sounds very racist, but I see your true intention behind it now… Regardless you still made all kinds of ridiculous off-base assumptions inside that statement and you therefore sounded like, as I said, a dumb-ass (which is different than saying you are a dumbass; which I do not believe).
I do not mince words, it was a fitting description given how much you incorrectly and arrogantly assumed.
You have reversed the order of events. NRA gun perspective predated Fox. Some NRA members are immature boys with gun fascination. Others are 2nd ammendment patriots. Fox perspectives seem to be plain language Constitutionalism. At least three persectives are in play which just happen to have a common physical representation. I would support an intelligence test for gun ownership, but few others would. But that would exclude the boys with gun fascination who are the most careless.
I looked at what I wrote and don’t know how it could be taken as racist since neither one of us know the other’s race. You see, that was an emotional reaction. That is the kind of reacting to which I object, and which is typical of “The Left” and suggests cognitive shortcomings. Of course I know that some will think that arrogant, but where is it written by the hand of some god that the truth must be pleasant?
I meant bigot, not bigotry….
Yes, I am a fan of Darwin and the such… Take a good look at what you said, it very much sounded like you were making racial accusations/commentaries with that statement… I am realizing that your intention was not as it came across, and if that is the case then I humbly retract all accusations of your being a bigotry…
Ok, thank you for clarifying. For the record my father is a responsible gun owner. I respect gun rights and I think it’s more respectful of those rights to admit when they should be lawfully restricted, and within the presence of the president is definitely one of those times… Perhaps you are not under the influence of Fox but I hate to break it to ya but the majority of the NRA is and it is most definitely a cause championed by them.
Surely you have accepted that humans have descended (not ascended) from chimps. Thus the entire zoology that is in the chimp is also in you, for instance, the gazelle. Herd animals prefer the safety of the herd – safety over freedom. This is inherited in different degrees by different people. Some also inherit the traits of the large cats and birds of prey. All of this is in your genetic code to varying degrees and causes perspectives. Most of perspective is mechanistic according to type.
Jeeeeezzzzuz. I did not ring the Hitler bell. It is plane as day in my comment that I was saying it would be unfair for me to do so. I was saying “I don’t do this to you so please don’t do this to me.” Why do I have to explain this a 3rd time? You are truly reaching way out into space here. End of discussion on that one.
KKKguy has nothing to do with me. I think it’s very funny that you are making such a deal of his remarks. Nihilism? What? You are way too serious. Loosen up!
numberous posters who I assume are from the left have accused those who support the 2nd ammendment of somehow being under the influence of foxnews. “Fox News” or “Bill O’Reilly” have become words that trigger ptsd in people who for the most part are emotionally immature and part of the spectrum of the weak and botched who for all history have hated all signs of sobriety and strength and beauty. It is most likely a phenotype-derived perspective and otherwise groundless.
I did read what you said. Your games are not clever. It’s like saying, “I don’t want to gossip, but….” and then gossiping. You rang the Hitler bell, once rung it can’t be unrung.
KKKguy must be taken seriously because he/she can vote, or will be ablt to oneday. And KKKguy is part of a spectrum and simply an extreme example of the essence of that side of the spectrum, namely goofiness and emotionality and self-referential perspectives that lead to nihilsim.