How Can A Government Run Health Insurance Entity “compete” With Private Companies? Will It Pay Taxes?

It boggles my thoughts which a proponents of a supervision run illness word entity would tangible state which this entity would move foe to a word arena. How would these in isolation businesses contest with someone who does not have to compensate taxes. How do companies contest with an entity which can literally lift taxes to compensate for operational costs or an entity which is saved non willingly by a adults of a United States? Can a in isolation word companies pass legislation which changes a manners of a diversion in a word business? No though a supervision could positively foreordain a manners of their own commercial operation by flitting legislation in a favor. Can someone greatfully give me a judicious reason as to how this supervision run illness word choice would do anything alternative than run in isolation word in to a belligerent to in conclusion pave a approach for a supervision to be a usually illness caring option?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • BarraPunto
  • blogmarks
  • blogtercimlap
  • Bumpzee
  • De.lirio.us
  • description
  • Faves
  • Hemidemi
  • laaik.it
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • muti
  • N4G
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • Tipd
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Upnews
  • Webnews.de
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb

Tags: , , , ,

8 Responses to “How Can A Government Run Health Insurance Entity “compete” With Private Companies? Will It Pay Taxes?”

  1. Mike F. says on :

    Nothing can compete with free. It’s not very difficult. All these left-wingers that come up with all these theories about how it will force private companies to lower their standards is just BS. Why would anyone stick to a private health insurance plan when their tax dollars are already paying for another one?

  2. mortgages Spain says on :

    They would force private providers to provide better care and lower their administrative costs (which are around 3 times higher than the admin. costs of European government-run systems). It would force for-profit providers to lower their profit margins, but it wouldn’t run them into the ground. This isn’t rocket science you know.

  3. Sunshine says on :

    They could stop gouging consumers with excessive costs. They’ve gouged us for years, and those “healthcare” costs aren’t actually used for healthcare, they line the CEO’s wallet. Gouging just like the oil companies did for awhile. It needs to stop.

  4. Bob says on :

    That is also a major complaint I have with the government’s bid to get a controlling share of GM. There is no way to compete with that as a private company.

  5. get back an ex says on :

    Your question can not be answered because you are absolutely right. No one can give you a legitimate reason because there isn’t one.

  6. ?????? says on :

    You apparently don’t know that most U.S. companies don’t pay taxes.

  7. Robin Hood was a tax protestor says on :

    Once the government sticks its fingers into anything the potential for a monopoly arises.

  8. riverrat says on :

    it,s just a way for gov. officials to put money in there pockets again or family members just a scam

Leave a Reply